God said to Adam] “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life. It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return” [Genesis 3:17-19].
A friend of mine posted this Mark Zuckerberg observation on Facebook last week. Ironically the phrase is a fast way to say something that needs to slowly work its way into our hearts and minds: the importance of taking our time in our work, in our leisure, in our thinking, in all our daily actions, and in our interactions with God’s creation. Another way to put it is the old maxim: “Haste makes waste.” (which is opposed to one of our most destructive quotes: “Time is money.”) [Crash painting source. Right click on all photos to see them larger.]
Also last week I came across another wise observation by slow-going farmer/philosopher Wendell Berry—on the difference between a path and a road found in his essay “A Native Hill”:
The difference between a path and a road is not only the obvious one. A path is little more than a habit that comes with knowledge of a place. It is a sort of ritual familiarity. As a form, it is a form of contact with a known landscape. It is not destructive. It is the perfect adaptation, through experience and familiarity, of movement to place; it obeys the natural contours; such obstacles as it meets it goes around. A road, on the other hand, even the most primitive road, embodies a resistance against the landscape. Its reason is not simply the necessity for movement, but haste. Its wish is to avoid contact with the landscape; it seeks so far as possible to go over the country, rather than through it; its aspiration, as we see clearly in the example of our modern freeways, is to be a bridge; its tendency is to translate place into space in order to traverse it with the least effort. It is destructive, seeking to remove or destroy all obstacles in its way. [For an interesting comparison, if you have Google Earth on your computer, look first at the streets of San Francisco, CA and then at the roads and streets leading into Madaba, Jordan. Which city layout do you think was formed by roads and which by paths?--DO] [Path photo source]
When you think of the damage done to the earth’s life-giving and life-preserving processes especially since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, it’s fairly easy to see that most of the destruction is done because of humankind’s desire to go fast. Roads, railroads, aircraft sky lanes and the vehicles that travel on them have resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and ten times more injuries. And they have expanded man’s destructive reach into all the wildernesses that God extolls in His address to Job about the wonders of His creation that most people previously could only imagine.
And as C. S. Lewis points out, the annihilation of time is partner to the annihilation of space. In his book Surprised By Joy, Lewis says this about his car-less youth:
The deadly power of rushing about wherever I pleased had not been given me. I measured distance by the standard of man, man walking on his two feet, not by the standard of the internal combustion engine. I had not been allowed to deflower the very idea of distance; in return I possessed “infinite riches” in what would have been to motorists “a little room.” The truest and most horrible claim made for modern transport is that it “annihilates space.” It does. It annihilates one of the most glorious gifts we have been given. It is a vile inflation which lowers the value of distance, so that a modern boy travels a hundred miles with less sense of liberation and pilgrimage and adventure than his grandfather got from traveling ten. Of course if a man hates space and wants it to be annihilated, that is another matter. Why not creep into his coffin at once? There is little enough space there. [Old Irish road photo source. Lewis spent his childhood in Ireland.]
An important part of God’s curse on the land to discipline Adam and his descendants—perhaps even for the purpose of keeping us from damage created by haste—was to impede our speed and capacity to wrest the earth to our selfish purposes: we would have to contend with “thorns and thistles” to obtain our food, shelter, and clothing. God no doubt knew that sinful, self-centered people with easy access to the fruit of the land—and access to the Tree of Life that would guarantee life unending—would rapidly damage His good creation. The earth has always had the capacity to feed, shelter, and clothe us all so long as we did not through haste. consumption, and “efficiency” spread waste all over the planet.
Has technology, one of mankind’s most revered and powerful gods, finally become little more than an in-Your-face defiance of the one true God: “we shall not do hard labor by the sweat of our brow!”? Evidence is growing that by our saving labor, we are spending our lives. As T. S. Eliot put it, we are “betrayed in the mazes of [our] ingenuities; sold by the proceeds of [our] proper inventions.” This was an echo of an earlier word from Henry David Thoreau: “We do not ride on the railroad; it rides upon us.” [Old train photo source]
I think it’s time for us to go slow and preserve things. Practice for the coming Kingdom—where speed will be mostly meaningless!

The difference between a path and a road is not only the obvious one. A path is little more than a habit that comes with knowledge of a place. It is a sort of ritual familiarity. As a form, it is a form of contact with a known landscape. It is not destructive. It is the perfect adaptation, through experience and familiarity, of movement to place; it obeys the natural contours; such obstacles as it meets it goes around. A road, on the other hand, even the most primitive road, embodies a resistance against the landscape. Its reason is not simply the necessity for movement, but haste. Its wish is to avoid contact with the landscape; it seeks so far as possible to go over the country, rather than through it; its aspiration, as we see clearly in the example of our modern freeways, is to be a bridge; its tendency is to translate place into space in order to traverse it with the least effort. It is destructive, seeking to remove or destroy all obstacles in its way. [For an interesting comparison, if you have Google Earth on your computer, look first at the streets of San Francisco, CA and then at the roads and streets leading into Madaba, Jordan. Which city layout do you think was formed by roads and which by paths?--DO] [Path photo
The deadly power of rushing about wherever I pleased had not been given me. I measured distance by the standard of man, man walking on his two feet, not by the standard of the internal combustion engine. I had not been allowed to deflower the very idea of distance; in return I possessed “infinite riches” in what would have been to motorists “a little room.” The truest and most horrible claim made for modern transport is that it “annihilates space.” It does. It annihilates one of the most glorious gifts we have been given. It is a vile inflation which lowers the value of distance, so that a modern boy travels a hundred miles with less sense of liberation and pilgrimage and adventure than his grandfather got from traveling ten. Of course if a man hates space and wants it to be annihilated, that is another matter. Why not creep into his coffin at once? There is little enough space there. [Old Irish road photo 
Answer: Technology by itself is neither good nor bad. Technology is primarily the process of people using God’s gift of creativity to do their work. While some people think that the need to work was a result of the Fall, the truth is that work is a primary activity of mankind assigned by God right along with the mandate to have dominion over and to cultivate and take care of the earth (Gen. 1-2). Work became much more difficult because of the Fall; so a great deal of mankind’s effort ever since has, through technology, been to make work easier and more efficient.
s into plowshares.” Implements of war will become implements of peaceful work, which provides for our daily bread—in a sense, Paradise regained. This stands in stark contrast to past and present civilizations pursuing the advantages of technology in the process of opposing God’s will. Powerful and efficient technological devices and processes in the service of self-aggrandizement and personal pleasure by those who have no desire to worship and honor the Creator or His creation will ultimately result in great evil (such as sophisticated terrorism and weapons of mass destruction in the hands of wicked people).
e to God—being careful to respect all of God’s creation. This calls for great wisdom and understanding as we utilize the best of scientific knowledge and investigation. When it is learned that our use of technology is doing more harm than good in reference to God’s purposes and God’s good earth, we need to have the will to change our ways. This often includes our ceasing to use certain technologies or altering them in such a way as to reverse their negative effects. Even seemingly harmless “high-tech” entertainment devices can negatively affect our lives as Christians. Below is a little “poem” I wrote a few years ago—which my kids felt was a bit over the top. But I believe it got them to think about their use of time a little more seriously:
In my last post I stirred up a good debate on the issue of technology. Although my primary intent was to recommend the use of wild places as a place of retreat from the pressures and distractions of modern life so heavily influenced by rapid technological change, I believe some felt that by my reference to Jacques Ellul’s writing I was condemning modern technology and was recommending a return to some idyllic, but fictitious, “good ole days.”
Technological Bluff was published in 1990 by Christian publisher Eerdmans. His major point in that book was a sort of twist on Emerson who said that “Things are in the saddle and ride mankind,” and held that, “Technology is in the saddle and rides mankind.”
One of the values of the wild is that helps put technology in its place. One way to understand this is to imagine yourself on a remote wooded ridge—say somewhere in the Ozarks. You’re suddenly engulfed by a violent thunderstorm, and while rushing to find shelter and safety, you find yourself in the company of two others in the same pursuit. Together you find a large overhanging rock ledge and crawl under it for cover. Finally at rest, you seek to begin a conversation but quickly find that verbal communication is hopeless—for the other two, because of some warp in time, are a French explorer from the late 1600′s and an Osage Indian from the 1200′s.
ump, who appear to have never have ventured more than a hundred yards away from a light switch and whose wilderness survival understanding could well be limited to the old joke that you start a fire by rubbing two boy scouts together.
facebook.com/
wonderofcreation
twitter.com/creationblog
wonderofcreation.org/
feed