It seems to me that when we consider the proper treatment of animals we should speak of man’s responsibilities as steward rather than to speak of the rights of animals. It’s far easier for me to ignore the rights of others than it is to ignore my personal conviction that I have God-given responsibilities toward others. Since the Bible does not really mention rights in regard to animals, I feel it’s much more important for us to consider what the Bible means when it says we are to be in dominion over the earth and its other creatures. First we need to keep in mind that the animals, like the remainder of the creation, belong to God; and it is a major responsibility for me to do with and for them what is right in God’s eyes.
Many non-Christian animal-rights activists react strongly against the biblical idea that man has a superior position in respect to the animals—thinking that such a belief leads to human arrogance and to our frequent ill treatment of the other creatures who share this earth with us. But like so many other truths, it is not the belief that’s the problem; it’s how we act in reference to that belief. While Christianity does not condone groundless sentimentality and the granting of personhood to animals, it does speak consistently of man’s responsibilities regarding them. Animals are creatures of God under the care of God and provided for by the natural systems God created, but they are also at our mercy—especially now that we have the technology to use, abuse, and even drive many of them to extinction.
In reality, humanity’s position of superiority should humble us; because for all our superiority, we are the ones who have sinned and continue to sin—not the animals. It is human sin that has created the havoc in the world that the animals must occupy (Romans 8:18-21). Thus superiority has, in sin, shown its potential to be a curse. Only in humble confession and submission before a holy God can we truly carry out the task of stewardship—the primary responsibility that goes hand-in-hand with our endowment of authority in the created order. As in all other relationships, prideful superiority has no place in man’s relationship to the world of animals.
In his very thorough theological examination of this question, Richard Bauckham reflects on what Francis of Assisi believed:
Francis’s principle (to be expressed most fully and beautifully at the end of his life in “The Canticle of Brother Son“) was that because the ‘creatures minister to our needs every day,’ and ‘without them we could not live,’ therefore we should appreciate them and praise God for them. Thus the theme of human dominion is understood theocentrically [God-centered] rather than anthropocentrically [man-centered]. The creatures’ service of humanity is properly received only as cause for praise and thankfulness to God. Therefore human dominion over the creatures becomes for Francis primarily a matter of dependence on the creatures, with whom humanity shares a common dependence on the Creator. The creatures on whose service we depend are not to be exploited, but to be treated with brotherly/sisterly respect and consideration. [Living With Other Creatures: Green Exegesis and Theology, p39; Richard Bauckham].
This, of course, raises a host of question about animals used for food and food production. I believe each of us is required to ask those questions. It is not the purpose of this website to advocate for particular policies and practices in this arena; there is a lot of information out there. But I have to confess that my own spirit is greatly disquieted about my lack of determined and decisive behavior regarding how food animals are treated. Do we allow them to praise their Creator by letting them live out their lives in keeping with their God-given nature?
KEY SCRIPTURE:
You must not muzzle an ox to keep it from eating as it treads out the grain (Deut. 25:4).
In his thought-provoking journal, John Woolman spoke about the sad state of domestic fowl aboard a ship he was taking to England. I believe his message and reflection are important for us today:
In observing their dull appearance at sea, and the pining sickness of some of them, I often remembered the Fountain of goodness, who gave being to all creatures, and whose love extends to caring for the sparrows. I believe where the love of God is verily perfected, and the true spirit of government watchfully attended to, a tenderness towards all creatures made subject to us will be experienced, and a care felt in us that we do not lessen that sweetness of life in the animal creation which the great Creator intends for them under our government.
[Click on the Lancaster County photos to see them larger. Click the back arrow to return to this site.]

His description of using the Congregational form of baptism by “sprinkling” has to make you chuckle—as well as his comment about his friend who thought they should have been totally immersed: “Those cats should have been grateful I was not [a Baptist].”
We did respect the Sacraments, but we thought the whole world of those cats. I got his meaning, though, and I did no more baptizing until I was ordained. . . . I still remember how those warm little brows felt under the palm of my hand. Everyone has petted a cat, but to touch one like that, with the pure intention of blessing it, is a very different thing. It stays in your mind. For years we would ponder what, from a cosmic viewpoint, we had done to them. It still seems to be a real question. There is a reality in blessing, which I take baptism to be, primarily. It doesn’t enhance sacredness, but it acknowledges it, and there is a power in that. I have felt it pass through me, so to speak. The sensation is of really knowing a creature. I mean really feeling its mysterious life and your mysterious life at the same time. [Kitten image 

animals, and people (who have often spurned intimacy with their Creator/Savior)—offer their praise. Central to it all is the recognition that the Lord is above both heaven and earth.
For those who are familiar with
Currently lost in my files is a print of a painting that depicts Jesus in the arms of Mary with a small bird perched on His finger. That and this etching in which it seems that Jesus is instructing Mary on the merits of a rose were apparent artistic attempts to link Jesus the infant Savior to Jesus the loving Creator. The intent of this artwork is a good reminder for us as we consider the Christ of Christmas, God in human flesh.
The creation Jesus entered is the creation He made, is the creation in which we live, is the creation John Muir loved, is the creation that groans under the heavy hand of sinful humanity, is the creation to which He will return, is the creation that He will redeem and reconcile to His Father, is the creation that in ways beyond imagination redeemed mankind will remain stewards of and continue to get sustenance from, and is the creation that will be blessed with the peace promised by the reign of Messiah whom we celebrate so joyously in the prophecies of Isaiah and in the music of George Frederick Handel.
In the carol we hear the prophecies of Isaiah and John of the Revelation repeated: “No more let sins and sorrows grow, nor thorns infest the ground; He comes to make His blessings flow far as the curse is found” (Revelation 22:1-3). Keep in mind that while we sing this carol to celebrate Jesus’ first advent, it is written about His second advent—after which the creation will once again become the “peaceable kingdom” pictured by Isaiah (chapters 11 & 65). [Wolf and lambs photo
I used to be a member of the Audubon Society—in large part in order to receive the always enjoyable Audubon magazine. My membership, of course, also gave me access to the local society meetings, which I attended for a while. But, to tell the truth, I always left those meetings with a feeling of sadness. I didn’t attend long enough to really develop any significant personal relationships with other members, but the impression I received was that few, if any, were followers of Christ. All seemed to be thoroughgoing naturalists in the philosophical meaning of that word. Nature provided them with their highest source of joy and practically functioned as their god. And when speakers would come and talk of the decline of this or that bird species or the continuing degradation of the natural world created by careless people, gloom settled on everyone.
Only Supernaturalists really see Nature. You must go a little away from her, and then turn around and look back. Then at last the true landscape will become visible. You must have tasted, however briefly, the pure water from beyond the world before you can be distinctly conscious of the hot, salty tang of Nature’s current. To treat her as God, or as Everything, is to lose the whole pith and pleasure of her.
If we are immortal, and if she is doomed (as scientists tell us) to run down and die, we shall miss this half-shy and half-flamboyant creature, this ogress, this [saucy girl], this incorrigible fairy, this dumb witch. But the theologians tell us that she, like ourselves, is to be redeemed. The ‘vanity’ to which she was subjected was her disease, not her essence. She will be cursed in character: not tamed (Heaven forbid) nor sterilized. We shall still be able to recognize our old enemy, friend, playfellow and foster mother, so perfected as to be not less, but more, herself. And that will be a merry meeting.
facebook.com/
wonderofcreation
twitter.com/creationblog
wonderofcreation.org/
feed