I have not yet been able to put your environmental concern into my view of the End Times.”
So said a good friend. He comes from the same biblical interpretation background I come from. I appreciate his candor. I know what he means: Since the earth will “wear out like a garment” (Heb. 1:11); since some of it will “melt” (2 Pet. 3:12); since Jesus will return for us; since our future home will be heaven; since man is most important to God, why should we care about the state of the earth? [Image source]

Raffaello, The Creation of the Animals, 1518-19, Palazzo Ponteficio--Vaticano
Part of my answer has to be this: We have been looking at the wrong end of the Bible to understand our relationship to the creation. I believe we need to look at the beginning. While how creation happened is constantly debated in Christian circles, there is seldom an argument about two early mandates found in the first two chapters of Genesis about how we use and relate to the creation: the “dominion mandate” in 1:26-31 and the “marriage mandate” in 2:21-24. Sandwiched between those two, however, is a third: the “stewardship mandate” in 2:15. We seldom question the dominion mandate or the marriage mandate. But I don’t think we do well with the stewardship mandate.
KEY SCRIPTURE:
The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it (Gen. 2:15 NIV)
Here we are told that man and woman were put into the Garden to cultivate it and to take care of it. The full sense of those infinitives in the Hebrew language includes being a husbandman, or steward, of it—a task that means putting a hedge around it, protecting it, serving it, preserving it, and saving it. I feel that this command is often the forgotten mandate. If we had been heeding this divine requirement as enthusiastically as we do the dominion mandate, I think things would be significantly different—at least in the Christian community today.
So why should we care about the state of the earth?
1) We should care because it is the obedient thing to do. Nowhere in Scripture do I see that the original mandates have been rescinded. Although our dominion is often abused because of the Fall, the dominion mandate remains our ideal. Although our marriages suffer because of sin, the marriage mandate remains our ideal. Although the task of stewardship is difficult in the presence of evil, the curse, and materialism, the creation care mandate remains our ideal. We indeed glorify God in our obedience to all three mandates.
2) We should care because it is the loving thing to do. In Psalm 145 we have this revealing verse: “The Lord is righteous in all His ways and loving toward all He has made” (Psa. 145:17). That verse follows right after the one that says God opens His hand and satisfies “the desires of every living thing.” At the very least we can understand from these verses that if God is righteous and loving toward all He has made, we can attempt to be the same. As Francis Schaeffer reminded us, “If we love the Lover, we will love what the Lover has made.” Further, when we care properly for the earth, we also demonstrate love for our neighbor and for ourselves—so that all aspects of the “greatest commandment” can be carried out. [Images of Jean-Francois Millet paintings]
Certainly there are many unanswered questions about the future state of the earth, the material final state of the believer, and the nature of heaven as it comes to earth. Nonetheless, it’s clear to me that Jesus’ promise of future bliss must never be an excuse for present carelessness regarding His creation. If the atoning sacrifice of the second Adam is going to result in the reconciliation of all things ruined by the sin of the first Adam (Col. 1:15-20); if all of creation is on tiptoe groaning for the day when it will be released from its bondage to decay (Rom. 8:20-22 Phillips); if Isaiah’s Messianic peaceable kingdom on earth is yet to come, how can I be less than a loving and careful steward of God’s creation handiwork? [Image source]
So since we are no doubt closer in time to the restoration of all things than we are to the time of the curse (Acts 3:19-21), our outlook should be that of Isaac Watts, who wrote of the coming return of Earth’s true King,
Joy to the world! The Lord is come;
Let earth receive her King;
Let every heart prepare Him room,
And heaven and nature sing. . . .
He comes to make His blessings flow
Far as the curse is found.

One of the reasons that C. S. Lewis continues to be a best-selling author long after his death is that much of what he wrote gains even more significance as the decades advance. My primary hardback copy of 

All of the rest of creation functions in relationship to humankind, and humankind serves the rest of creation as God’s vice regent. Among the many things that the image of God may signify and imply, one of them, and probably the main one, is that people are delegated a godlike role (function) in the world where He places them. It has already been mentioned that whereas in the rest of the ancient world creation was set up to serve the gods, a theocentric view, in Genesis, creation is not setup for the benefit of God but for the benefit of humanity—an anthropocentric view. Thus we can say that humanity is the climax of the creation account.
the rest of creation. Hence the creation suffers and “waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed” (Romans 8:19).






facebook.com/
wonderofcreation
twitter.com/creationblog
wonderofcreation.org/
feed