Aug 30

Those Glorious “Sun Daggers”

icon1 Posted by Dean Ohlman |  icon4 August 30th, 2011
icon2 Filed in beauty, Nature, outdoors |  icon3 Comment now » 

One hundred species of goldenrod even!

“Solidago” is the genus name of goldenrod, made up of Latin terms that could have meant to the original scientific classifier, “sun dagger.”  I love these goldenrod days—for a variety of reasons: they typically herald the end of the uncomfortably hot days of summer, they mark the coming of fall with its anti-chlorophyll insurgence, and they’re just simply beautiful—especially when an entire field of goldenrod appears like a mirror to reflect the face of the sun.

KEY SCRIPTURE:
What a wildly wonderful world, God! You made it all, with Wisdom at your side, made earth overflow with your wonderful creations (Eugene Peterson’s paraphrase of one of my favorite verses about the Creator and His creation: Psalm 104:24 from The Message).

Spring wildflowers are subtle and quiet (excepting dandelions!), appearing mostly in the deep shade and often hidden to those who don’t actually walk in the woods.  Fall wildflowers, on the other hand, are loud and brazen—revealing their glory even to speeding freeway travelers like a vast crowd of bridal attendants in brilliant silks, satins, and chiffons standing in rapt attention as the Preacher pronounces His blessing on the due process of life and procreation.

In the north, goldenrod is by far the most effusive fall wildflower, washing the country canvass with yellow upon which the Creator dabs purplish aster, white boneset, and a variety of colors and sizes of fleabane, and the last of the daisies, Queen Anne’s lace, and black-eyed Susans.

As a kid I was of the hand-me-down impression that goldenrod was the cause of hay fever—an impression that was wrong.  Ragweed produces its spiked wind-blown pollen just when goldenrod blooms.  And it is the cause of most fall plant allergies, but because its flowers remain mostly green, it stays below our visual radar.  Goldenrod pollen is sticky and heavy and is spread not by the wind, but by dozens of different pollinators that make a field of goldenrod busy like a factory.

The Canada goldenrod, the most common variety, is also the typical host of the goldenrod gall fly, a tiny insect that inserts its eggs into the flower stem.  When the egg hatches, the larval fly begins to eat the plant material, its saliva causing the goldenrod to produce extra growth at the spot which sometimes grows to the size of golf ball: a gall.  So in the winter many of the dead brown stalks sport this noticeable gall ball that downy woodpeckers and Carolina chickadees in particular see as an invitation to a meal—because the larva remains in the plant all winter long, its having the capacity to create an antifreeze that keeps it alive in subfreezing temperatures.  A few times I collected several dozen of these galls to pluck out the larval fly, which is excellent ice-fishing bait for panfish.  But I found most of them already emptied by other insect predators.

The joy of the outdoors for me is in discovering that every form of life is full of wonder, and much of that wonder still remains a mystery.  Science may indeed provide us with many answers about the wonders of creation, but it is still baffled by the source and even the nature of life itself.  And that brings us back to the psalmist:  “[Your] knowledge is too wonderful for me, too lofty for me to attain” (139:6).  We talk about the “information explosion” we’re experiencing.   Can you imagine how blown away we would be if the divine genius that resides in the common goldenrod—a plant that comes in over a hundred different varieties—actually revealed all its knowledge to us?  “Too wonderful” I’m sure would be my response.

God’s World

O WORLD, I cannot hold thee close enough!
Thy winds, thy wide grey skies!
Thy mists, that roll and rise!
Thy woods, this autumn day, that ache and sag
And all but cry with colour! That gaunt crag
To crush! To lift the lean of that black bluff!
World, World, I cannot get thee close enough!

Long have I known a glory in it all,
But never knew I this;
Here such a passion is
As stretcheth me apart,—Lord, I do fear
Thou’st made the world too beautiful this year;
My soul is all but out of me,—let fall
No burning leaf; prithee, let no bird call.

-Edna St. Vincent Millay (1892–1950). Renascence and Other Poems. 1917.

Aug 28

When Capitalism Becomes a Disease

icon1 Posted by Dean Ohlman |  icon4 August 28th, 2011
icon2 Filed in belief systems, Biblical worldview |  icon3 3 Comments » 

C. S. Lewis was a great lover of nature and animals, and the entire body of his writings developed in thousands of Christians a great respect for the physical world—God’s general revelation.  The Narnia series in particular had an obvious Edenic feel where animals and people interacted with each other in respect and worship of the lion Aslan, a type of Christ, whose death provided for the redemption of all creation (Romans 8:18ff).  His science fiction trilogy also had strong Edenic symbolism with its final volume, That Hideous Strength, depicting animals, people, and even the planets joining together to defeat of the cruel naturalistic, atheistic, technological “machine” that had taken over the educational establishment and sought to circumvent the government.  It is a striking picture of the “abolition of man” in which man’s power over nature eventually results in nature’s power over man—the biblical principle that what a man sows he also reaps.

KEY SCRIPTURE:
Is it not enough for you to feed on the good pasture? Must you also trample the rest of your pasture with your feet? Is it not enough for you to drink clear water? Must you also muddy the rest with your feet?
(Ezekiel 34:18)

Lewis’ fellow Inkling Dorothy Sayers wrote several essays touching on both materialism and the abuse of the material world.  In pleading the case for a return to an authentic Christianity not burning with the fever of consumption, she quoted T. S.  Eliot:  “A wrong attitude towards nature implies, somewhere, a wrong attitude towards God, and the consequence is an inevitable doom.”  Sayers went on to warn us:

So long as the Church continues to teach the manhood of God and to celebrate the sacraments of [The Lord's Supper] and marriage, no living man should dare to say that matter and body are not sacred to her.  She must insist strongly that the whole material universe is an expression and incarnation of the creative energy of God, as a book or a picture is a material expression of the creative soul of the artist.  For that reason, all good and creative handling of the material universe is holy and beautiful. . . .  The whole question of the right use to be made of art, of the intellect, and of the material resources of the world is bound up in this.  Because of this, the exploitation of man or matter for commercial uses stands condemned, together with all debasement of the arts and perversions of the intellect.  If matter and the physical nature of man are evil, or if they are of no importance except as they serve an economic system, then there is nothing to restrain us from abusing them as we choose—nothing, except the absolute certainty that such abuse will eventually come up against the unalterable law and issue in judgment and destruction.

One wonders if Dorothy Sayers was indicating (perhaps unaware) the prophecy of Revelation 11:18: The nations were angry; and your wrath has come. The time has come for judging the dead, and for rewarding your servants the prophets and your saints and those who reverence your name, both small and great—and for destroying those who destroy the earth.

In His sermon on the mount, Jesus plainly tells us that we cannot serve God and wealth (Mammon).  Much of what we have been calling God’s blessing is little more than raw wealth.  J. Budziszewski comments on capitalism devoid of Christian moral values in First Things:  “Even Adam Smith recognizes that the invisible hand does not work unless laborers and businessmen submit themselves to the restraints of justice, and that an interest in wealth alone will not induce them to do so. After all, if winning is all that matters, why keep the competition going at all? Why not use one’s wealth to wring special privileges from the government and so become more wealthy still? Capitalism depends on a moral spirit which it cannot supply and may even weaken; it is, in the most exact of senses, a parasite on the faith.”

I pray that all who name the name of Christ will pay heed to J. Budziszewski’s final appeal to us:

Citizenship is an obligation of the faith, therefore the Christian will not abstain from the politics of the nation-state. But his primary mode of politics must always be witness. It is a good and necessary thing to change the welfare laws, but better yet to go out and feed the poor. It is a good and necessary thing to ban abortion, but better yet to sustain young women and their babies by taking them into the fellowship of faith. This is the way the kingdom of God is built.  It is not by the world that the world is moved—yet how it pulls. Ah, God, help us let go of the heights and the depths, the thrones and dominions, the powers and principalities; to be not conservatives, nor yet liberals, but simply Christians. “Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord of Hosts.”

By failing to be that Christian witness in the marketplace we do little to keep capitalism from turning into the disease of mammonism.  And if it is not addressed rapidly and aggressively, mammonism can turn fatal.

Aug 25

Genesis and Naturalism (Part 3)

icon1 Posted by Dean Ohlman |  icon4 August 25th, 2011
icon2 Filed in Biblical worldview, Creator |  icon3 Comment now » 

This is the last in a series of statements that looks at the Genesis creation account as it is referenced by the remainder of the Bible.  These statements highlight the historic general view of the Christian faith regarding the facts and understandings about man’s origin and his moral history.  The philosophical naturalist does not accept these Christian conclusions.

Our statements end with an affirmation of hope that was so aptly celebrated by Isaac Watts [photo] in his great hymn about the Second Advent of Jesus Christ and the eventual remediation of the consequences of the original spiritual rebellion: “Joy to the World” [Reread the lyrics here. It is unfortunate that we sing this only during the celebration of the First Advent.  It is a forward-looking doxology that should be sung all year long.]

KEY SCRIPTURE:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. . . . He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:1-3,10-14).

8. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe that there was a previous rebellion in the unseen spirit world and its evil influences were a threat to man and his environment.

This prehistoric revolt in the spiritual realm was carried over into the material realm by a sinful spirit who persuaded the first man and woman to disregard their Creator’s terms for the perpetuation of human life in harmony with His purposes. This disobedience resulted in the spiritual and eventual physical death of our first parents. It also had a negative effect on the rest of the creation. To remind the human family of its fallen condition, God added consequences to the human rebellion. Other judgments followed, many of which changed the nature of life on earth and distorted the original relationships.

According to Genesis, many of the problems that burden the natural world have their origin in God’s decision to add struggle and pain to the life of His creatures as a sort of severe mercy. These judgments, which confirmed that we could find fulfillment only in proper relationship to God, can be seen in the biblical descriptions of what happened in the fall (Gen. 3:1-7), the curse (Gen. 3:16- 19), the flood (Gen. 6–9), and the tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9).

The belief that much of our suffering and hardship is the result of spiritual rebellion spilling over into our material realm and our Creator’s consequent, but loving discipline is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview, which holds that until the advent of modern man all changes on the earth were unrelated to purposeful and intelligent activity—except perhaps from some extraterrestrial intelligent material beings other than God. The material realm is not influenced by a spiritual realm.

9. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe that after the spiritual fall of our first parents, the experience of human sin and death created problems that people could not solve on their own (Gen. 3:15; Rev. 13:8).

Throughout the rest of the Bible, we read the record of our Creator’s loving pursuit of a lost and fallen humanity. This redemption theme runs throughout the Old and New Testaments and is fulfilled in the most inexpressible and miraculous act of intervention. The New Testament summarizes this redemptive rescue: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. . . . He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:1-3,10-14).

This belief that God personally appeared on earth and intervened to rescue us from sin and death is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview that all people, like all animals, will eventually die, decompose, and be gone forever—that nothing within the human being survives death except our chemical components, which will be recycled naturally to perpetuate life and its evolution.

10. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe in a God who is powerful and merciful enough to bring about the eventual restoration, renewal, and reunification of the entire creation.

Even though the Genesis creation account gives us only a fleeting foreshadow of God’s redemptive purposes, this prefiguration is the beginning of a great story that ends with the abode of God the Father and reign of God the Son on the earth as it is pictured in the final two chapters of the book of Revelation. The rest of the story assures us that the paradise lost by our human parents will be regained. The apostle Peter proclaimed: “Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began” (Acts 3:19-21; see also Isa. 11:6-9, Rom. 8:19-23, and Eph. 1:10).

The belief that God will eventually restore all that has been lost is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview that recognizes no God and no Savior for threatened humanity. Naturalism asserts that there is no future hope for the individual person, just a general hope for a humanity that will survive only by doing what it can to assure the “progress” of evolution.

 

Aug 24

New “Ambling” Post

icon1 Posted by Dean Ohlman |  icon4 August 24th, 2011
icon2 Filed in Uncategorized |  icon3 Comment now » 

If you know anything about bamboo you understand why I use the word “rogue” in reference to it. Once loose, it runs amok and muscles out virtually everything in its path—dead or alive! That’s why, of course, in its native habitat people have used it for an almost endless number of purposes—if for nothing more than keeping it from taking over.  No doubt because of its ubiquity, bamboo has been an art theme for centuries.  Because of my fascination with it, it has become one of my favorite photographic and art subjects.  Bamboo is the topic of today’s “Ambling” post.

Aug 23

Genesis and Naturalism (Part 2)

icon1 Posted by Dean Ohlman |  icon4 August 23rd, 2011
icon2 Filed in Biblical worldview, Creator |  icon3 Comment now » 

Today we look at four more beliefs arising from the Genesis creation account that all Bible believers can agree on regardless of what opinions they hold about the age of the earth or what literary genre the first eleven chapters of Genesis may be.

KEY SCRIPTURE:
He has made the earth by His power, He has established the world by His wisdom, and has stretched out the heavens at His discretion (Jeremiah 10:12).

4. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe that the order of our material world has its source in the purpose and plan of an all-wise and all-powerful Creator.

By the design and loving intent of God, the astronomical features of the universe, as well as the oceans, land, and atmosphere of the earth were formed. The Creator progressively invested His genius in the formation of the elements, plants, and animals of the natural world and established their interdependencies. By His willful and purposeful plan, God created all life-forms and enabled each of them to reproduce “according to its kind” (Gen. 1:24).

The book of God’s special revelation explains what we see around us: Nature’s mathematical precision and operation is the result of God’s purposeful and intelligent design. “He has made the earth by His power, He has established the world by His wisdom, and has stretched out the heavens at His discretion” (Jer. 10:12). It was this great awareness that inspired the songwriter of Israel to declare, “O Lord, how manifold are Your works! In wisdom You have made them all. The earth is full of Your possessions” (Ps. 104:24).

This belief that the abundance of life on earth is inherently valuable, meaningful, purposeful (beyond the perpetuation of evolution)—and that life is the gift of God’s Spirit—is in radical contrast to the naturalistic worldview, which states that the existence of the cosmos is accidental and that the features of the earth, including life, are merely the unintended and unplanned result of matter plus time plus chance.

5. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying that the triune God constantly oversees and sustains the creation and continues to grant life to all living things.

After singing to the One who laid the foundations of the earth, the psalmist celebrated the sustaining work of the Creator when he wrote: “He sends the springs into the valleys; they flow among the hills. They give drink to every beast of the field; the wild donkeys quench their thirst. By them the birds of the heavens have their home; they sing among the branches. He waters the hills from His upper chambers; the earth is satisfied with the fruit of Your works. He causes the grass to grow for the cattle, and vegetation for the service of man, that he may bring forth food from the earth . . . . These all wait for You, that You may give them their food in due season. . . . You hide Your face, they are troubled; You take away their breath, they die and return to their dust. You send forth Your Spirit, they are created; and You renew the face of the earth” (Ps. 104:10-14,27,29-30). [See also Colossians 1:15-17]

This belief in a creating God who also sustains His creation by the word of His mouth is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview that fundamental natural laws and mathematical principles of unknown origin sustain and maintain the integrity of the universe. That no deity is required for either energy or matter to exist is a fundamental presupposition of philosophical naturalism.

6. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe that the personhood of man and woman has its origin in a personal Creator who made us in His own image.

To crown His creation, God used the nonliving matter of the earth to create a living man. Then, to provide man with a companion and complement that would assure the perpetuation of the race, He took living tissue from the man to create a woman [The first act of genetic engineering by the Chief Engineer!]. The Bible calls this original, morally accountable human pair Adam and Eve.

The book of God’s special revelation says, “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them” (Gen. 1:27); “and the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being” (Gen. 2:7); “then the rib which the Lord God had taken from man He made into a woman” (Gen. 2:22).

This belief that of all God’s creatures only man and woman were made in God’s likeness is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview, which emphasizes that mankind is merely the product of unguided evolution and that mankind has no special nature related directly to the personhood or loving intention of a supernatural Creator. In the view of naturalism, people are merely the most evolved of animals and have no special relationship to a personal God.

7. When we declare that the Genesis account of creation is true, we’re saying we believe that the relationships we enjoy with all creation have their origin in a God who is eternally relational (the Trinity).

The result of God’s purposeful creation was a series of relationships that explain much about the meaning of human life. Not only did God create people, He entered into a personal relationship with them. In the beginning, He was in fellowship with Adam and Eve and walked with them in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:8). The relationship of God to the earth was ownership. The people of Israel declared their acceptance of this claim when they sang, “The earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness, the world and those who dwell therein” (Ps. 24:1). The relationship of mankind to the earth was stewardship. From the first days of man’s life on earth, he understood that his responsibility was to care for the earth that his Maker entrusted to him: “The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to tend and keep it” (Gen. 2:15).

This belief that we were made for relationships that have their origin in our triune Creator is in contrast to the naturalistic worldview that does not acknowledge God. Naturalism denies the existence of any interpersonal or authoritative relationships or responsibilities aside from those necessitated by the animal drive to survive.

 

« Previous Entries